This should have been my usual morning post - but I got a little sidetracked, so now its an afternoon post - with a lot of information.
Sidebar: They really need a better way to make like bullet points on here - each of these paragraphs is a different topic.
Okay, go out and eat please ... just do it ... Nathan's in Georgetown is apparently hurting so much that they might not be able to renew their lease this coming April. I've honestly only dined there twice, but I've passed by a million times, and it is truly a Georgetown icon. I get this information via Marc Fisher in WaPo this morning - in an article about Georgetown turning generic. Apparently Nathan's was feeling the hurt even before the union-induced recession, so I can't imagine that things are faring any better. So the next time I am in Georgetown, I think I am going to pop in for a bite to eat - I've only been for brunch so I might as well try another meal. Though I will say, there brunch is pretty good. I will add though, that if you are looking for hole-in-the-wall sports bars/restaurants in Georgetown - Chadwicks is really good. I basically just undermined this entire post by recommending another restaurant over Nathan's -- lol -- go to both I guess. Yum!
Education. Education. Education. Rhee. Rhee. Rhee. I have yet to have the honor of posting about The Iron Chancellor on this blog, but I will. The reason I bring this up is Obama's nomination for Minister of Education (I'm pretty much over this whole 'Secretary' business - Minister sounds better), Arne Duncan. I don't know the guy, he's certainly no Iron Chancellor, but she's also not ready to be MoE. The Paper of Record has all the deets about this guy here, he seems to be pretty legit - straddling the divide between destroying evil unions and getting our schools the resources they need. He has the experience, the brains, and the temperament to be an excellent Minister. I am glad to see that Mr. Duncan is so focused on early childhood education, it makes absolutely no sense to start reforms in middle schools and high schools when the kids are coming without the proper educational background. I look forward to positive changes and hopefully no children will be left behind.
BusinessWeek ran with a story yesterday about Airbus keeping it's 'edge' on Boeing. Let's just start with the facts, If it ain't Boeing, I'm not going. Any 'edge' that BusinessWeek asserts that Airbus has proves that BW has no idea how to run a business. Airbus is kept afloat by the EU, their business model is non-existent, they just make up designs that have planes looking like Sperm Whales and then receive billions of dollars in government subsidies in order to keep the program afloat - as far as I am concerned Airbus is unreal, it doesn't qualify as a legitimate business. Anyway back to the BW article, it talks about how Airbus didn't get the memo that no one wants Sperm Whale planes and they are looking for smaller, lighter, more agile planes like the godsend the Dreamliner. I'm pretty sure according to Boeing's original timeline, I was supposed to be flying in a Dreamliner right now ... but that didn't happen. Then again when you completely reinvent the manufacturing process to make a plane completely out of composite you are bound to run into some delays. The 787 is now not expected to deliver until mid-2010, sadness. Though that still puts it light years (4 years-ish) ahead of Airbus' lackluster competitor the a350 (which is essentially a plane they already make). Boeing also has double the orders for the 787 than Airbus does for the a350. I mean basically its a fact, Boeing is better. I don't know why BW wrote this article, it was a waste of everyone's time ... Airbus should have gone bankrupt years ago.
All this talk of planes has me quite happy - I love planes. And I love Boeing. It also reminded me to check out the blog of a good friend of mine - Jon Ostrower - who writes FlightBlogger. Anytime I come across a blog post about airplanes, Jon is linked somewhere in the post because he knows everything about everything. He's quite smart and seems to get all the deets before anyone else, so he's clearly a good guy to know (and a good blog to read). Anyway, I popped over to his blog (link again - yea you should go, its that good.), and he is leading with a story about the Chinese cancelling or delaying aircraft deliveries in 2009. He points out this sucks for our friends over at Airbus, who are currently building a new factory over there. I'm sure the EU will rush in to bail them out and make sure they remain an unreal and illegitimate business.
Taking the airplane thought and merging into a new topic. ... I would have included this in my Dreamliner discussion, but it had already gotten too long and off track - unions. It is clear to me and basically every economist in the world (not verified) that the unions have caused the current recession - jk. sort of. Anyway, a union-lead strike caused a 58 day delay with Boeing's Dreamliner, probably causing a much bigger delay due to a backlog of parts that showed up - couldn't be put in the right places, etc, etc. The Big Three had horrible business practices and didn't seem to get that people weren't going to buy SUVs for ever, but even with that stupidity I think they could have survived on their own. Except for the fact that they are saddled with huge health care costs for retirees -- and they can't actually close down a factory. Yea, that is absolutely my favorite. When they close a factory or shutdown a production line, or really attempt to save any sort of money ... they still have to pay the people who work there. Yea? Does that make much sense to you? In essence, they have absolutely no flexibility. That is like if over the next 3 years when Bank of America lays off some 35,000+ employees, they just got to go home but still got paid 95% of their salary. I'm sorry ... what? Is this socialism? Why even bother having a business if you can't make any decisions to save money. I'm sure old Socialism Corrupt will have a post up in seconds about how unions are the 'fabric of our nation' and saved this and that and are the greatest - blah blah blah. Yea, I'll admit it ... unions were good for quite some time - they have served their role, but they are inefficient and have no place in the 21st century. Making a case for unions is like making a case for a horse drawn carriage over a car - yea its pretty cool, but its certainly not the best way to travel and it costs so much more money than it could ever be worth. So you heard it here first, I'm calling on the 2010 Republican Congressional Majority to pass a law abolishing all unions. Actually, why go through Congress - unions should just disband themselves on their own. Okay .. that's good.
I can't wait to see Corrupt's response to this union banter - he frequently gets in a tizzy about such things. He's all about making sure that people get paid for work they aren't actually doing.
I was trying to look up what happened with that whole Jim Graham wants underage kids to get trashed thing - but the Legislative Information Management System (LIMS) seems to require intricate knowledge of the legislation in order to find it - which kind of defeats the purpose in my eyes. So I decided to read the Council's agenda for this afternoon ... this thing is like a 3-ring circus. Their day seems to be occupied with approving resolutions naming streets and buildings after people. Of note! On the Consent portion of the agenda is the final vote for the approval of Verizon's Cable franchise, which means FiOS! FiOS! FiOS! Oh I'm excited. Anyway I discover that Jim Graham and the other cowboys over at the Council have decided to go ahead and approve this Bill (B17-0983) 13-0. Unreal. Fenty I'm counting on you buddy ... you made the right choice with Rhee and Lainer, make the right choice on this one. Well I'm glad that Jim Graham has succeeded in getting kids drunk, hopefully they don't vomit all over his lawn.
The Paper of Record ran an Op-Ed today, declaring the death of dating. It is over, it is done with, hook ups are here to stay. According to the article, a new study by Child Trends has found that more High School seniors saying they never date than date frequently - aka they are whores. Well this is great for our society. Actually ... it is a very interesting article, and its also intriguing to see the amount of studies that have been done into this whole hook-up thing. Makes sense to me, like the article notes - I am more likely to hook up with someone a few times, and if it is good - then go on a date.
Caroline Kennedy - get a life, do something else. You will not be the Senator from The Great State of New York. The Daily Intel has the rundown of the opinions out there, here.
Okay ... this has gone on for long enough. Enjoy.
2 comments:
Tim Shame,
What a rant!! I'm not even sure where to start, but I'll reply in time. The gauntlet is down...
:-)
-Morgan CORRupt
Muffin what a lot to absorb.
Let me tell you one thing, it may not be American, but living in Europe it sure is nice to get all this vacation time, and not get paid any less. I'm not saying I'm a socialist, but I am saying that I do enjoy reaping some of the "more socialist-like" tendencies that Belgium has to offer.
xo
Post a Comment